Giulia Quadrifoglio vs H9 2.0T Deluxe Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
250 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4643 mm
5137 mm
1860 mm
1904 mm
1426 mm
1493 mm
2820 mm
3060 mm
Fuel Economy
58 L
62 L
/
14.1 Km/L
/
14.1 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.9 L
2.0 L - 3.0 L
200 BHP - 505 BHP
241 - 321 BHP
Automatic
7DCT & 8AT & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
4 - 5
Exterior
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.9 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
505 BHP
252 BHP
600 Nm
380 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
Giulia Quadrifoglio
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
H9 2.0T Deluxe
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickH9 2.0T Deluxe
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Giulia Quadrifoglio if you care more about overall equipment; choose H9 2.0T Deluxe if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Giulia Quadrifoglio has a fuel consumption of No data, while H9 2.0T Deluxe has a fuel consumption of 7.09. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Giulia Quadrifoglio has a wheelbase of 2820 mm, while H9 2.0T Deluxe has a wheelbase of 3060 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, H9 2.0T Deluxe, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Giulia Quadrifoglio uses Rear Wheel Drive, while H9 2.0T Deluxe uses Rear Wheel Drive.