Giulia Quadrifoglio vs Stinger 2.0T (255 PS) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
240 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4643 mm
4830 mm
1860 mm
1870 mm
1426 mm
1400 mm
2820 mm
2905 mm
/
406 L
Fuel Economy
58 L
60 L
/
12.7 Km/L
/
12.7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.9 L
2.0 L - 3.3 L
200 BHP - 505 BHP
251 BHP - 365 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
Engine
2.9 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
505 BHP
251 BHP
600 Nm
353 Nm
Technologies
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Giulia Quadrifoglio
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Stinger 2.0T (255 PS)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickStinger 2.0T (255 PS)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Giulia Quadrifoglio if you care more about overall equipment; choose Stinger 2.0T (255 PS) if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Giulia Quadrifoglio has a fuel consumption of No data, while Stinger 2.0T (255 PS) has a fuel consumption of 7.87. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Giulia Quadrifoglio has a wheelbase of 2820 mm, while Stinger 2.0T (255 PS) has a wheelbase of 2905 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Stinger 2.0T (255 PS), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Giulia Quadrifoglio uses Rear Wheel Drive, while Stinger 2.0T (255 PS) uses Rear Wheel Drive.