GLA 200 vs 5 2WD Standard Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210km/h
180 km/h
4
/
1332 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
1,485
/
5 Doors
5 Doors
4,410 mm
4710 mm
1,834 mm
1930 mm
1,611 mm
1620 mm
2729 mm
2875 mm
425 L
367 L
Fuel Economy
15 Km/L
/
43 L
/
15 Km/L
/
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
7-speed automatic (7G-DCT)
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.3 L - 2.0 L
0.0 L -
163 BHP - 224 hp
220 BHP - 530 BHP
7-speed automatic (7G-DCT) & Automatic
AT
Gasoline
Electric & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 - 5
Engine
In-Line
/
1.3 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
Single Turbo
/
4
/
163 BHP
295 BHP
120
/
250Nm
420 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
GLA 200
5 2WD Standard
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
- Child Lock
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's Pick5 2WD Standard
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GLA 200 if you care more about overall equipment; choose 5 2WD Standard if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GLA 200 has a fuel consumption of 6.67, while 5 2WD Standard has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GLA 200 has a wheelbase of 2729 mm, while 5 2WD Standard has a wheelbase of 2875 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 5 2WD Standard, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GLA 200 uses Front Wheel Drive, while 5 2WD Standard uses Rear Wheel Drive.