GLA 200 vs Bronco Badlands 2.7L Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210km/h
180 km/h
4
6
1332 cc
2698 cc
GCC
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
1,485
/
5 Doors
4 Doors
4,410 mm
4800 mm
1,834 mm
1937 mm
1,611 mm
1962 mm
2729 mm
2950 mm
425 L
562 L
/
260 m
Fuel Economy
15 Km/L
9.2 Km/L
43 L
79 L
15 Km/L
9.2 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
12
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
7
Transmission
7-speed automatic (7G-DCT)
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.3 L - 2.0 L
2.3 L - 3.0 L
163 BHP - 224 hp
181 - 418 BHP
7-speed automatic (7G-DCT) & Automatic
8-speed Automatic & Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
4 - 5
Engine
In-Line
V
1.3 L
2.7 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
4
163 BHP
330 BHP
120
/
250Nm
542 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
GLA 200
Bronco Badlands 2.7L
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Attractive and iconic design
- Excellent off-road capabilities
- Multiple engine options
Negative
- High price for top categories
- Limited internal storage space
- Significant fuel consumption
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GLA 200 if you care more about price; choose Bronco Badlands 2.7L if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GLA 200 has a fuel consumption of 6.67, while Bronco Badlands 2.7L has a fuel consumption of 10.87. Therefore, GLA 200 is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GLA 200 has a wheelbase of 2729 mm, while Bronco Badlands 2.7L has a wheelbase of 2950 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Bronco Badlands 2.7L, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GLA 200 uses Front Wheel Drive, while Bronco Badlands 2.7L uses Four Wheel Drive.