GLA 200 vs Max RS Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210km/h
/
4
/
1332 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
1,485
/
5 Doors
/
4,410 mm
4785
1,834 mm
1930
1,611 mm
1625
2729 mm
2880
425 L
/
/
20"
Fuel Economy
15 Km/L
/
43 L
56
15 Km/L
/
Interior
/
Front Row Seats
/
10.2
/
Front and Back Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
15.6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
19
Transmission
7-speed automatic (7G-DCT)
single-speed AT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
/
double wishbone suspension
/
multi-link suspension
Key Spec
1.3 L - 2.0 L
1.5L
163 BHP - 224 hp
496 hp
7-speed automatic (7G-DCT) & Automatic
AT & single-speed AT
Gasoline
Electric & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5
Engine
In-Line
/
1.3 L
1.5L
Gasoline
Hybrid
Single Turbo
/
4
/
163 BHP
496 hp
120
/
250Nm
675
/
Turbocharge
/
365
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
GLA 200
Max RS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMax RS
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GLA 200 if you care more about overall equipment; choose Max RS if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GLA 200 has a fuel consumption of 6.67, while Max RS has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GLA 200 has a wheelbase of 2729 mm, while Max RS has a wheelbase of 2880. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Max RS , offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GLA 200 uses Front Wheel Drive, while Max RS uses Four-Wheel Drive.