GLA 250 4MATIC vs GLA 250 4MATIC Comparison
Car Information
SUV
/
Dimensions
5
/
1,600
/
4,410
/
1,834
/
1,611
/
2,729
/
Fuel Economy
6.6 L/100 km
/
Comfort
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Key Spec
1.3 L - 2.0 L
/
163 BHP - 224 hp
/
7-speed automatic (7G-DCT) & Automatic
/
Gasoline
/
TBD
/
5 - 5
/
Engine
2.0 L
/
Gasoline
/
224 hp
/
165
/
350 Nm
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
GLA 250 4MATIC
- 360 Degree Camera
GLA 250 4MATIC
- 360 Degree Camera
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGLA 250 4MATIC
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GLA 250 4MATIC if you care more about overall equipment; choose GLA 250 4MATIC if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GLA 250 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of 15.15, while GLA 250 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of 15.15. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GLA 250 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 2,729, while GLA 250 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 2,729. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GLA 250 4MATIC uses No data, while GLA 250 4MATIC uses No data.