GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC vs Bronco Badlands 2.7L Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
180 km/h
4
6
1991 cc
2698 cc
GCC
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
4 Doors
4412 mm
4800 mm
2020 mm
1937 mm
1616 mm
1962 mm
2729 mm
2950 mm
425 L
562 L
/
260 m
Fuel Economy
12 Km/L
9.2 Km/L
65 L
79 L
12 Km/L
9.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
Leather
Digital
Digital
✓
Dual Zone
✓
Electric
✓
Standard
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
12
✓
Android LCD
✓
7
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
8-speed automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L
2.3 L - 3.0 L
302 BHP
181 - 418 BHP
8-speed automatic
8-speed Automatic & Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
4 - 5
Exterior
✓
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
V
2.0 L
2.7 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
2.0 L turbocharged
/
Single Turbo
/
4
4
302 BHP
330 BHP
225
/
400 Nm
542 Nm
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC
- Remote key types
Bronco Badlands 2.7L
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Attractive and iconic design
- Excellent off-road capabilities
- Multiple engine options
Negative
- High price for top categories
- Limited internal storage space
- Significant fuel consumption
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC if you care more about fuel economy; choose Bronco Badlands 2.7L if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of 8.33, while Bronco Badlands 2.7L has a fuel consumption of 10.87. Therefore, GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 2729 mm, while Bronco Badlands 2.7L has a wheelbase of 2950 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Bronco Badlands 2.7L, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Bronco Badlands 2.7L uses Four Wheel Drive.