GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC vs EHS9 Executive Comparison

Car Information

5.1

/

/

160+245

/

≥500

/

99

Engine / Motor

250 km/h

200 km/h

4

/

1991 cc

/

GCC

Chinese

Dimensions

5 Seater

7 Seater

5 Doors

5 Doors

4412 mm

5209 mm

2020 mm

2010 mm

1616 mm

1713 mm

2729 mm

3110 mm

425 L

438 L

/

200 m

Fuel Economy

12 Km/L

/

65 L

/

12 Km/L

/

Comfort

Smart Entry

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

Leather

Digital

Digital

4-Zone

Electric

Bucket

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

16.2

Android LCD

8

/

/

/

/

Transmission

8-speed automatic

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Four-Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.0 L

/

302 BHP

429 BHP - 543 BHP

8-speed automatic

Automatic

Gasoline

Electric

TBD

/

5 Seater

4 Seater - 7 Seater

/

TBD

/

320 km - 515 km

Exterior

LED

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

/

2.0 L

/

Gasoline

Electric

2.0 L turbocharged

/

Single Turbo

/

4

/

302 BHP

429 BHP

225

/

400 Nm

300+450

Motor

/

8

/

options.Lithium-Ion

/

160+245 kW

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC

    • Remote key types
  • EHS9 Executive

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickGLA 35 AMG 4MATIC

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC if you care more about price; choose EHS9 Executive if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mercedes Benz | GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC

VS

Nissan | Nissan Patrol SE Titanium 3.8L

Mercedes Benz | GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC

VS

Nissan | Nissan Patrol 2024 4.0L SE Titanium

Mercedes Benz | GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC

VS

Lincoln | Lincoln Nautilus 2023 2.7T V6 Presidential

Mercedes Benz | GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC

VS

Nissan | Nissan Patrol 2019 5.6L LE Titanium Chrome PKG

Mercedes Benz | GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC

VS

Li Auto | Li Auto L9 2024 1.5T Pro

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of 8.33, while EHS9 Executive has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 2729 mm, while EHS9 Executive has a wheelbase of 3110 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EHS9 Executive, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC uses Four-Wheel Drive, while EHS9 Executive uses All Wheel Drive.