GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC vs F Pace 2.0T SE (250 ps) Comparison
Car Information
5.1
/
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
217 km/h
4
/
1991 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
/
4412 mm
4746 mm
2020 mm
2070 mm
1616 mm
1664 mm
2729 mm
2874 mm
425 L
650 L
Fuel Economy
12 Km/L
13.5 Km/L
65 L
63 L
12 Km/L
13.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
8-speed automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
2.0 L turbocharged
/
Single Turbo
/
4
/
302 BHP
246 BHP
225
/
400 Nm
365 Nm
Key Spec
/
2.0 L - 5.0 L
/
246 BHP - 550 BHP
/
Automatic
/
Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
5 Seater
Comparison of configuration highlights
GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC
- Remote key types
F Pace 2.0T SE (250 ps)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickF Pace 2.0T SE (250 ps)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC if you care more about power; choose F Pace 2.0T SE (250 ps) if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of 8.33, while F Pace 2.0T SE (250 ps) has a fuel consumption of 7.41. Therefore, F Pace 2.0T SE (250 ps) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 2729 mm, while F Pace 2.0T SE (250 ps) has a wheelbase of 2874 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, F Pace 2.0T SE (250 ps), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC uses Four-Wheel Drive, while F Pace 2.0T SE (250 ps) uses All Wheel Drive.