GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC vs GLB 250 4MATIC Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
236 km/h
4
/
1991 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
6 Seater
5 Doors
/
4412 mm
4634 mm
2020 mm
1834 mm
1616 mm
1662 mm
2729 mm
2829 mm
425 L
570 L
Fuel Economy
12 Km/L
13.9 Km/L
65 L
60 L
12 Km/L
13.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
8-speed automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L
1.3 L - 2.0 L
302 BHP
163 BHP - 306 BHP
8-speed automatic
7-speed dual-clutch automatic & 8-speed automatic & Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 - 7 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
2.0 L turbocharged
/
Single Turbo
/
4
/
302 BHP
224 BHP
225
/
400 Nm
350 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC
- Remote key types
GLB 250 4MATIC
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGLA 35 AMG 4MATIC
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC if you care more about price; choose GLB 250 4MATIC if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of 8.33, while GLB 250 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of 7.19. Therefore, GLB 250 4MATIC is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 2729 mm, while GLB 250 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 2829 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, GLB 250 4MATIC, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC uses Four-Wheel Drive, while GLB 250 4MATIC uses All Wheel Drive.