GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
210 km/h
4
6
1991 cc
3490 cc
GCC
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
4412 mm
5115 mm
2020 mm
1980 mm
1616 mm
1920 mm
2729 mm
2890 mm
425 L
1004 L
/
221 m
Fuel Economy
12 Km/L
9.4 Km/L
65 L
110 L
12 Km/L
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
Fabric
Digital
Digital
✓
Dual Zone
✓
Electric
✓
Standard
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
9
✓
Android LCD
✓
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
8-speed automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L
3.3 L - 5.7 L
302 BHP
240 BHP - 409
8-speed automatic
10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode & Automatic & Manual
Gasoline
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
7 - 8 Seater
Exterior
✓
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
V
2.0 L
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
2.0 L turbocharged
/
Single Turbo
Twin Turbo
4
4
302 BHP
271 BHP
225
/
400 Nm
385 Nm
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC
- Remote key types
Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Sensor Rear Tailgate
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC if you care more about fuel economy; choose Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of 8.33, while Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR has a fuel consumption of 10.64. Therefore, GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 2729 mm, while Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR has a wheelbase of 2890 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR uses Four Wheel Drive.