GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC vs Max RS Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
/
4
/
1991 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
5 Doors
/
4412 mm
4785
2020 mm
1930
1616 mm
1625
2729 mm
2880
425 L
/
/
20"
Fuel Economy
12 Km/L
/
65 L
56
12 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Front Row Seats
/
10.2
/
Front and Back Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
15.6
✓
/
✓
19
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
8-speed automatic
single-speed AT
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
/
double wishbone suspension
/
multi-link suspension
Key Spec
2.0 L
1.5L
302 BHP
496 hp
8-speed automatic
AT & single-speed AT
Gasoline
Electric & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
1.5L
Gasoline
Hybrid
2.0 L turbocharged
/
Single Turbo
/
4
/
302 BHP
496 hp
225
365
400 Nm
675
/
Turbocharge
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC
- Remote key types
Max RS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMax RS
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC if you care more about overall equipment; choose Max RS if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of 8.33, while Max RS has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 2729 mm, while Max RS has a wheelbase of 2880. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Max RS , offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Max RS uses Four-Wheel Drive.