GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC vs RX 350h Platinum 2.5L Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
260 km/h
4
4
1991 cc
2490 cc
GCC
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
4412 mm
4890 mm
2020 mm
1920 mm
1616 mm
1695 mm
2729 mm
2850 mm
425 L
350 L
/
160 m
Fuel Economy
12 Km/L
15 Km/L
65 L
65 L
12 Km/L
15 Km/L
Comfort
✓
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
Leather
Digital
Digital
✓
Dual Zone
✓
Electric
✓
Standard
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
14
✓
Android LCD
✓
21
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
8-speed automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L
3.5 L - 3.5 L
302 BHP
246 BHP - 366 BHP
8-speed automatic
6 Speed Automatic Transmission & 8 Speed Automatic Transmission & AT & Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT)
Gasoline
Hybrid & Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater - 5 Seater
Exterior
✓
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
2.0 L
2.5
Gasoline
Hybrid
2.0 L turbocharged
/
Single Turbo
None
4
4
302 BHP
246 BHP
225
/
400 Nm
315 Nm
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC
- Remote key types
RX 350h Platinum 2.5L
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Luxury design and high quality
- Good fuel efficiency
- Advanced technology and amenities
Negative
- The price is high for some competitors
- Limited back-end storage space
- Less sharp control compared to some sports cars
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC if you care more about price; choose RX 350h Platinum 2.5L if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of 8.33, while RX 350h Platinum 2.5L has a fuel consumption of 6.67. Therefore, RX 350h Platinum 2.5L is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 2729 mm, while RX 350h Platinum 2.5L has a wheelbase of 2850 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, RX 350h Platinum 2.5L, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC uses Four-Wheel Drive, while RX 350h Platinum 2.5L uses Front Wheel Drive.