GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC vs Yukon 5.3 V8 SLE (2WD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
/
4
/
1991 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
5 Doors
/
4412 mm
5334 mm
2020 mm
2057 mm
1616 mm
1943 mm
2729 mm
3071 mm
425 L
/
Fuel Economy
12 Km/L
/
65 L
/
12 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
8-speed automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L
5.3 L - 6.2 L
302 BHP
320 BHP - 420 BHP
8-speed automatic
10 SPEED AUTOMATIC & Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
7 - 9 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
5.3 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
2.0 L turbocharged
/
Single Turbo
/
4
/
302 BHP
355 BHP
225
/
400 Nm
520 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC
- Remote key types
Yukon 5.3 V8 SLE (2WD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious interior space
- Excellent towing capabilities
- Advanced entertainment systems
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Their price is relatively high
- Its large size may be inappropriate for some areas
Related comparisons
Editor's PickYukon 5.3 V8 SLE (2WD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC if you care more about overall equipment; choose Yukon 5.3 V8 SLE (2WD) if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of 8.33, while Yukon 5.3 V8 SLE (2WD) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 2729 mm, while Yukon 5.3 V8 SLE (2WD) has a wheelbase of 3071 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Yukon 5.3 V8 SLE (2WD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GLA 35 AMG 4MATIC uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Yukon 5.3 V8 SLE (2WD) uses Front Wheel Drive.