Gladiator Sport 3.6L vs Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
220 km/h
206 km/h
6
4
3600 cc
1984 cc
GCC
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
5 Doors
5537 mm
4485 mm
1874 mm
1856 mm
1905 mm
1585 mm
3487 mm
2680 mm
1005 L
530 L
254 m
170 m
Fuel Economy
7 Km/L
11 Km/L
83 L
60 L
7 Km/L
11 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Keyless Entry
Smart Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
Single
Dual Zone
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Manual
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
Standard
Standard
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
12.3
9
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
8
6
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.6 L
1.4 L - 2.0 L
285 BHP
150 BHP - 180 BHP
Automatic
TBD
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Halogen
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
V
In-Line
3.6 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
4
4
285 BHP
180 BHP
352 Nm
320 Nm
/
Single Turbo
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Gladiator Sport 3.6L
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Gladiator Sport 3.6L if you care more about price; choose Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Gladiator Sport 3.6L has a fuel consumption of 14.29, while Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD has a fuel consumption of 9.09. Therefore, Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Gladiator Sport 3.6L has a wheelbase of 3487 mm, while Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD has a wheelbase of 2680 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Gladiator Sport 3.6L, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Gladiator Sport 3.6L uses Four Wheel Drive, while Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD uses Front Wheel Drive.