GLC 200 4Matic vs AITO 9- 5 seater Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
5
5
4656
5230
1890
1999
1639
1800
2873
3110
550
/
/
22"
/
5
Fuel Economy
7.1
/
66
65L
Interior
/
Front Row Seats
/
15.6
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
16
/
✓
/
✓
/
23
Transmission
Automatic
AT
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
/
Intelligent air suspension
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
1.5L
211 BHP - 255
489 - 496 hp
9-speed automatic & Automatic
AT
Gasoline
Electric & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5
5
Engine
2.0
1.5L
Gasoline
Hybrid
211 BHP
496 hp
350
675Front:315/Rear:360
/
365Front:165/Rear:200
Exterior
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Galaxy
/
✓
Motor
/
365Front:165/Rear:200
Technologies
/
192 Laser LiDRA + 3 Millimeter-wave radar
/
12 Ultrasonic radar + 7 High perception camera + 4 Surround view camera
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
GLC 200 4Matic
AITO 9- 5 seater
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickAITO 9- 5 seater
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GLC 200 4Matic if you care more about overall equipment; choose AITO 9- 5 seater if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GLC 200 4Matic has a fuel consumption of 14.08, while AITO 9- 5 seater has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GLC 200 4Matic has a wheelbase of 2873, while AITO 9- 5 seater has a wheelbase of 3110. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, AITO 9- 5 seater , offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GLC 200 4Matic uses Four-Wheel Drive, while AITO 9- 5 seater uses Four-Wheel Drive.