GLC 200 4Matic vs Sportage 2.0L MPI EX (AWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
181 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4656
4660 mm
1890
1865 mm
1639
1665 mm
2873
2755 mm
550
543 L
Fuel Economy
7.1
12.5 Km/L
66
54 L
/
12.5 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0
1.6 L - 2.4 L
211 BHP
130 BHP - 184 BHP
Automatic
7-SPEED DCT & 7-SPEED DCT AUTO TRANSMISSION & Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5
5 - 5
Engine
2.0
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
211 BHP
155 BHP
350
192 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
GLC 200 4Matic
Sportage 2.0L MPI EX (AWD)
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern design and comfortable cabin
- Spacious interior and comfortable seating
- Comprehensive intelligent technology and specifications
Negative
- Poor performance at high speeds
- The transmission response is slow when accelerating
- Internal materials need to be improved
Related comparisons
Editor's PickSportage 2.0L MPI EX (AWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GLC 200 4Matic if you care more about interior space; choose Sportage 2.0L MPI EX (AWD) if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GLC 200 4Matic has a fuel consumption of 14.08, while Sportage 2.0L MPI EX (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 8. Therefore, Sportage 2.0L MPI EX (AWD) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GLC 200 4Matic has a wheelbase of 2873, while Sportage 2.0L MPI EX (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2755 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, GLC 200 4Matic, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GLC 200 4Matic uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Sportage 2.0L MPI EX (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.