GLC Coupe 200 4Matic vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
161 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4656
4341 mm
1890
1804 mm
1639
1693 mm
2873
2676 mm
550
414 L
Fuel Economy
7.1
17.2 Km/L
66
50 L
/
17.2 Km/L
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
-
1.6 L - 2.0 L
211 BHP - 671
105 BHP - 135 BHP
9-speed automatic & AMG SPEEDSHIFT 9-speed automatic & Automatic
Automatic & CVT & Manual
Gasoline & Hybrid
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5
5 - 5
Engine
2.0
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
211 BHP
115 BHP
350
156 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
GLC Coupe 200 4Matic
Duster 1.6L PE (4x2)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDuster 1.6L PE (4x2)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GLC Coupe 200 4Matic if you care more about interior space; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GLC Coupe 200 4Matic has a fuel consumption of 14.08, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GLC Coupe 200 4Matic has a wheelbase of 2873, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, GLC Coupe 200 4Matic, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GLC Coupe 200 4Matic uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) uses Front Wheel Drive.