GLE 450 4MATIC vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
200 km/h
6
4
2999 cc
1998 cc
GCC
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
5 Doors
4924 mm
4760 mm
1948 mm
1930 mm
1796 mm
1927 mm
2995 mm
2750 mm
655 L
400 L
198 m
224 m
Fuel Economy
9 Km/L
10 Km/L
85 L
75 L
9 Km/L
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
Keyless Entry
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
Leather
Digital
Digital
✓
Dual Zone
✓
Electric
✓
Standard
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
12.3
✓
Android LCD
✓
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
AT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.0 L - 3.0 L
2.0 L
333 BHP - 429 BHP
223 BHP - 342 BHP
9-speed automatic & AT
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
3.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
Single Turbo
4
4
429 BHP
224 BHP
560 Nm
387 Nm
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
GLE 450 4MATIC
- Remote key types
300 Challenger 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GLE 450 4MATIC if you care more about interior space; choose 300 Challenger 2.0T if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GLE 450 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of 11.11, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, 300 Challenger 2.0T is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GLE 450 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 2995 mm, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, GLE 450 4MATIC, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GLE 450 4MATIC uses All Wheel Drive, while 300 Challenger 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive.