GLE 450 4MATIC vs EREV RWD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
/
6
/
2999 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4 Doors
/
4924 mm
4,825
1948 mm
1,980
1796 mm
1,620
2995 mm
2,940
655 L
/
198 m
/
Fuel Economy
9 Km/L
/
85 L
/
9 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
AT
Single-speed Fixed-Ratio Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
/
Key Spec
3.0 L - 3.0 L
1.5 L - 1.5 L
333 BHP - 429 BHP
310 - 590
9-speed automatic & AT
AT & Single-speed Fixed-Ratio Automatic & Single-speed Fixed-Ratio Automatic.
Gasoline & Petrol
Electric & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5
Exterior
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
/
3.0 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Hybrid
Single Turbo
/
4
/
429 BHP
310
560 Nm
367
/
1,152
Comparison of configuration highlights
GLE 450 4MATIC
- Remote key types
EREV RWD
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEREV RWD
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GLE 450 4MATIC if you care more about interior space; choose EREV RWD if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GLE 450 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of 11.11, while EREV RWD has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GLE 450 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 2995 mm, while EREV RWD has a wheelbase of 2,940. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, GLE 450 4MATIC, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GLE 450 4MATIC uses All Wheel Drive, while EREV RWD uses No data.