GLE 450 4MATIC vs SQ6 e-tron Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
/
6
/
2999 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4 Doors
/
4924 mm
/
1948 mm
/
1796 mm
/
2995 mm
/
655 L
514
198 m
/
/
64
Fuel Economy
9 Km/L
/
85 L
/
9 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
Dinamica Microfibre
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Sport Seats Plus
/
11.9
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
14.5
✓
/
✓
/
Battery/Charging
/
270
/
11
/
10 min
Transmission
AT
DHT
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
/
对
Key Spec
TBD
/
TBD
TBD
TBD
DHT
TBD
Electric
TBD
/
TBD
5
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
3.0 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
Single Turbo
/
4
/
429 BHP
/
560 Nm
/
Motor
/
Lithium-ion
/
489
Technologies
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
GLE 450 4MATIC
- Remote key types
SQ6 e-tron
- 360 Degree Camera
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickSQ6 e-tron
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GLE 450 4MATIC if you care more about overall equipment; choose SQ6 e-tron if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GLE 450 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of 11.11, while SQ6 e-tron has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GLE 450 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 2995 mm, while SQ6 e-tron has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GLE 450 4MATIC uses All Wheel Drive, while SQ6 e-tron uses Four-Wheel Drive.