Mercedes-AMG GLE 63 S 4MATIC+ vs RX Comfort 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
280 km/h
185 km/h
8
4
3998 cc
1998 cc
European
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
5 Doors
4,954 mm
4781 mm
1,947 mm
1920 mm
1,782 mm
1671 mm
2,995 mm
2815 mm
500 L
500 L
200 m
187 m
Fuel Economy
12.5
16 Km/L
85 L
50 L
6.8 Km/L
16 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Smart Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
None
Dual Zone
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
Bucket
Standard
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
12.3
12.3
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
14
8
Transmission
9-speed automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.0 L - 4.0 L
2.0 L - 2.0 L
367 BHP - 625 hp
245 HP - 261 BHP
9-speed automatic
7DCT & 8AT & Automatic
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
V
In-Line
4.0 L
2.0 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
Twin Turbo
Twin Turbo
4
4
625 hp
261 BHP
850 Nm
400 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mercedes-AMG GLE 63 S 4MATIC+
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
RX Comfort 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mercedes-AMG GLE 63 S 4MATIC+ if you care more about interior space; choose RX Comfort 2.0T if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mercedes-AMG GLE 63 S 4MATIC+ has a fuel consumption of 8, while RX Comfort 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 6.25. Therefore, RX Comfort 2.0T is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mercedes-AMG GLE 63 S 4MATIC+ has a wheelbase of 2,995 mm, while RX Comfort 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2815 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mercedes-AMG GLE 63 S 4MATIC+, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mercedes-AMG GLE 63 S 4MATIC+ uses All Wheel Drive, while RX Comfort 2.0T uses Front Wheel Drive.