Mercedes-AMG GLE 63 S 4MATIC+ vs Tiggo7 Pro Max COM Comparison
Car Information
/
Engine / Motor
280 km/h
/
8
/
3998 cc
/
European
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4 Doors
5
4,954 mm
4500
1,947 mm
1842
1,782 mm
1746
2,995 mm
2670
500 L
/
200 m
/
/
Flush Door
/
18
Fuel Economy
12.5
16.6
85 L
/
6.8 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
Driver Seat
✓
Driver Seat
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
None
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Bucket
/
/
Driver Seat
/
12.3
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
12.3
12.3
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
✓
14
6
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
9-speed automatic
7DCT
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
V
/
4.0 L
1.6 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
Twin Turbo
/
4
/
625 hp
197 BHP
850 Nm
290
/
1.6L TDGI
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
/
1.5 L - 1.6 L
/
197 BHP
/
7DCT
/
Gasoline
/
TBD
/
5
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mercedes-AMG GLE 63 S 4MATIC+
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Tiggo7 Pro Max COM
- 360 Degree Camera
- Push Button Start
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Steering Adjustment
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mercedes-AMG GLE 63 S 4MATIC+ if you care more about interior space; choose Tiggo7 Pro Max COM if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mercedes-AMG GLE 63 S 4MATIC+ has a fuel consumption of 8, while Tiggo7 Pro Max COM has a fuel consumption of 6.02. Therefore, Tiggo7 Pro Max COM is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mercedes-AMG GLE 63 S 4MATIC+ has a wheelbase of 2,995 mm, while Tiggo7 Pro Max COM has a wheelbase of 2670. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mercedes-AMG GLE 63 S 4MATIC+, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mercedes-AMG GLE 63 S 4MATIC+ uses All Wheel Drive, while Tiggo7 Pro Max COM uses Front Drive.