GLS 450 4MATIC vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
161 km/h
6
/
2999 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
/
5207 mm
4341 mm
2030 mm
1804 mm
1850 mm
1693 mm
3135 mm
2676 mm
493 L
414 L
200 m
/
Fuel Economy
8 Km/L
17.2 Km/L
90 L
50 L
8 Km/L
17.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
9-speed automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.0 L - 4.7 L
1.6 L - 2.0 L
375 BHP - 550 BHP
105 BHP - 135 BHP
9-speed automatic & 9G-TRONIC 9-speed automatic & Automatic
Automatic & CVT & Manual
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 7
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
/
3.0 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
375 BHP
115 BHP
275
/
500 Nm
156 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
GLS 450 4MATIC
- 360 Degree Camera
- Remote key types
- Blind Spot Warning
Duster 1.6L PE (4x2)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDuster 1.6L PE (4x2)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GLS 450 4MATIC if you care more about interior space; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GLS 450 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of 12.5, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GLS 450 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 3135 mm, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, GLS 450 4MATIC, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GLS 450 4MATIC uses All Wheel Drive, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) uses Front Wheel Drive.