GLS 450 4MATIC vs Tiggo 9 Comfort Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
/
6
/
2999 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
7
5 Doors
/
5207 mm
4810
2030 mm
1925
1850 mm
1742
3135 mm
2800
493 L
/
200 m
/
/
19
Fuel Economy
8 Km/L
13
90 L
/
8 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Driver Seat
/
10.25
/
✓
/
10.25"
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
Triple
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
/
6
Infotainment
✓
15.6
✓
✓
✓
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Battery/Charging
/
4
Transmission
9-speed automatic
AT
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
3.0 L
2.0L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
375 BHP
254
275
/
500 Nm
390
/
Turbocharge
/
2.0T GDI
Key Spec
/
2.0
/
254
/
Automatic
/
Gasoline
/
TBD
/
7
Technologies
/
19 ADAS Functions
/
✓
/
✓
/
Eco + Normal + Sport
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
GLS 450 4MATIC
- 360 Degree Camera
- Remote key types
- Blind Spot Warning
Tiggo 9 Comfort
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Number of Airbags
- Blind Spot Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickTiggo 9 Comfort
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GLS 450 4MATIC if you care more about interior space; choose Tiggo 9 Comfort if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GLS 450 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of 12.5, while Tiggo 9 Comfort has a fuel consumption of 7.69. Therefore, Tiggo 9 Comfort is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GLS 450 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 3135 mm, while Tiggo 9 Comfort has a wheelbase of 2800. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, GLS 450 4MATIC, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GLS 450 4MATIC uses All Wheel Drive, while Tiggo 9 Comfort uses Front Drive.