GLS 450 4MATIC vs Mercedes-AMG GLC 63 S E PERFORMANCE Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
275
6
/
2999 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
5
5 Doors
/
5207 mm
4,716
2030 mm
1,890
1850 mm
1,648
3135 mm
2,888
493 L
/
200 m
/
/
2,310
Fuel Economy
8 Km/L
13.3
90 L
65
8 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Burmester®
Transmission
9-speed automatic
9-speed automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
3.0 L
2.0L
Gasoline
Hybrid
Single Turbo
✓
4
/
375 BHP
671
275
500
500 Nm
1,020
/
2.0 L turbocharged inline-4 + rear electric motor
Comparison of configuration highlights
GLS 450 4MATIC
- 360 Degree Camera
- Remote key types
- Blind Spot Warning
Mercedes-AMG GLC 63 S E PERFORMANCE
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMercedes-AMG GLC 63 S E PERFORMANCE
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GLS 450 4MATIC if you care more about interior space; choose Mercedes-AMG GLC 63 S E PERFORMANCE if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GLS 450 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of 12.5, while Mercedes-AMG GLC 63 S E PERFORMANCE has a fuel consumption of 7.52. Therefore, Mercedes-AMG GLC 63 S E PERFORMANCE is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GLS 450 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 3135 mm, while Mercedes-AMG GLC 63 S E PERFORMANCE has a wheelbase of 2,888. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, GLS 450 4MATIC, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GLS 450 4MATIC uses All Wheel Drive, while Mercedes-AMG GLC 63 S E PERFORMANCE uses Four-Wheel Drive.