GLS 450 4MATIC vs Tiggo7 Pro Max COM Comparison

Car Information

6.2

/

Engine / Motor

250 km/h

/

6

/

2999 cc

/

GCC

/

Dimensions

7 Seater

5

5 Doors

5

5207 mm

4500

2030 mm

1842

1850 mm

1746

3135 mm

2670

493 L

/

200 m

/

/

Flush Door

/

18

Fuel Economy

8 Km/L

16.6

90 L

/

8 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

Manual

Interior

/

Digital

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Driver Seat

/

12.3

/

Driver Seat

/

Driver Seat

/

Driver Seat

/

Driver Seat

/

/

/

/

/

Dual

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

Infotainment

12.3

/

6

/

/

/

/

Transmission

9-speed automatic

7DCT

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Front Drive

Exterior

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

/

3.0 L

1.6 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

Single Turbo

/

4

/

375 BHP

197 BHP

275

/

500 Nm

290

/

1.6L TDGI

Technologies

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • GLS 450 4MATIC

    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Remote key types
    • Blind Spot Warning
  • Tiggo7 Pro Max COM

    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Push Button Start
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Steering Adjustment

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickTiggo7 Pro Max COM

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose GLS 450 4MATIC if you care more about interior space; choose Tiggo7 Pro Max COM if you care more about fuel economy.

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, GLS 450 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of 12.5, while Tiggo7 Pro Max COM has a fuel consumption of 6.02. Therefore, Tiggo7 Pro Max COM is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, GLS 450 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 3135 mm, while Tiggo7 Pro Max COM has a wheelbase of 2670. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, GLS 450 4MATIC, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GLS 450 4MATIC uses All Wheel Drive, while Tiggo7 Pro Max COM uses Front Drive.