CarteaCompare CarsGR86 MT 2.4L vs Dodge Challenger 2020 3.6L GT

GR86 MT 2.4L vs Dodge Challenger 2020 3.6L GT Comparison

Car Information

/

6.6

/

Engine / Motor

4

6

/

200

Dimensions

4

5 Seater

18

/

4265

5.027

1775

1.923

1310

1.460

/

2.950

/

459

Fuel Economy

12.2

9.8

50

70

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

Front Row Seats

/

/

Dual

/

Main Ultrasuede, Side Leather With Yellow Stitching.

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

Driver Airbag, Front Passenger Airbag, Driver's Knees Airbag, Side Airbags, Curtain Airbags.

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

8

/

6

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

6-speed Manual Transmission

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

/

Rear Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

215/40 R18

/

215/40 R18

/

Key Spec

2.4 L - 228.0 L

3.6 L - 6.4 L

228 BHP - 233 BHP

300 BHP - 797 BHP

6-speed Automatic Transmission & 6-speed Manual Transmission & Automatic Transmission & Manual

Automatic & Manual

Petrol & Gasoline

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

4 Seater - 4 Seater

2 Seater - 5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.4L

3.6 L

Gasoline

Petrol

228

305 BHP

250

363

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • GR86 MT 2.4L

    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Number of Airbags
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Lane Departure Warning
  • Dodge Challenger 2020 3.6L GT

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Push Button Start
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Powerful engine performance and amazing acceleration
  • Classic and bold exterior design
  • Comfortable and spacious interior space

Negative

  • High fuel consumption
  • Difficulty with control and low flexibility
  • Lack of Intelligent Systems Technologies

Related comparisons

Editor's PickGR86 MT 2.4L

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose GR86 MT 2.4L if you care more about price; choose Dodge Challenger 2020 3.6L GT if you care more about power.

Popular Car Comparisons

Toyota | GR86 MT 2.4L

VS

Dodge | Dodge Challenger 2020 3.6L GT

Toyota | GR86 MT 2.4L

VS

Dodge | Dodge Challenger 2019 3.6L GT

Toyota | GR86 MT 2.4L

VS

Volkswagen | Volkswagen Beetle 2018 SE Cabriolet

Toyota | GR86 MT 2.4L

VS

Volkswagen | Volkswagen Beetle 2018 2.0L SEL

Toyota | GR86 MT 2.4L

VS

Toyota | GR86 MT 2.4L

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, GR86 MT 2.4L has a fuel consumption of 8.2, while Dodge Challenger 2020 3.6L GT has a fuel consumption of 10.2. Therefore, GR86 MT 2.4L is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, GR86 MT 2.4L has a wheelbase of No data, while Dodge Challenger 2020 3.6L GT has a wheelbase of 2.950. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GR86 MT 2.4L uses No data, while Dodge Challenger 2020 3.6L GT uses Rear Wheel Drive.