Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190 km/h
200 km/h
6
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
4828 mm
4760 mm
1943 mm
1930 mm
1792 mm
1927 mm
2916 mm
2750 mm
782 L
400 L
/
224 m
Fuel Economy
/
10 Km/L
23 Gallon/ 87L
75 L
10 Km/L
10 Km/L
Comfort
Smart Keyless Entry
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
2nd Row Manual 60:40 Split
Standard
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
Collision Mitigation Braking System (CMBS)
/
Blind Spot Information System
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
Transmission
8AT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.6 L - 6.4 L
2.0 L
286 BHP - 707 BHP
223 BHP - 342 BHP
8AT & Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 - 7
5 Seater
Exterior
Black
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.6 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
3.6L V6
/
293 BHP
224 BHP
350 Nm
387 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- ABS
300 Challenger 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Versatility of options for powerful engines
- Impressive off-road driving capabilities
- High-end interior, equipped with modern technologies
Negative
- High fuel consumption for some models
- High price compared to some competitors
- Large size, difficult to maneuver in confined spaces
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo if you care more about interior space; choose 300 Challenger 2.0T if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo has a fuel consumption of No data, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo has a wheelbase of 2916 mm, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo uses All Wheel Drive, while 300 Challenger 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive.