Grand Highlander XLE vs 300 Challenger 2.0T HEV Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
220 km/h
200 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
5116 mm
4760 mm
1989 mm
1930 mm
1781 mm
1927 mm
2964 mm
2750 mm
1639 L
400 L
/
224 m
Fuel Economy
9 Km/L
15 Km/L
85 L
75 L
9 Km/L
15 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.4 L
2.0 L
266 BHP
342 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
7 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.4 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Hybrid
266 BHP
342 BHP
420 Nm
648 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Grand Highlander XLE
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
300 Challenger 2.0T HEV
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's Pick300 Challenger 2.0T HEV
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Grand Highlander XLE if you care more about interior space; choose 300 Challenger 2.0T HEV if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Grand Highlander XLE has a fuel consumption of 11.11, while 300 Challenger 2.0T HEV has a fuel consumption of 6.67. Therefore, 300 Challenger 2.0T HEV is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Grand Highlander XLE has a wheelbase of 2964 mm, while 300 Challenger 2.0T HEV has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Grand Highlander XLE, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Grand Highlander XLE uses Front Wheel Drive, while 300 Challenger 2.0T HEV uses Four Wheel Drive.