Grand i10 1.2 FLT vs R4 Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
5 Seater
/
1420
/
3995
/
1680
/
1510
/
2450
/
Fuel Economy
18.1
/
Key Spec
1.0 L - 1.2 L
/
67 BHP - 84 BHP
TBD
Automatic
TBD
Gasoline
Electric
TBD
/
5 Seater
TBD
/
TBD
/
TBD
Engine
1.2 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
83 BHP
/
114
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Grand i10 1.2 FLT
R4
Review Comparison
Positive
- Practical and comfortable interior design
- Economical in fuel consumption
- The cost is moderate compared to the class
Negative
- Engine performance is limited
- The storage space is small
- The interior material is not of high quality
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickR4
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Grand i10 1.2 FLT if you care more about overall equipment; choose R4 if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Grand i10 1.2 FLT has a fuel consumption of 5.52, while R4 has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Grand i10 1.2 FLT has a wheelbase of 2450, while R4 has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Grand i10 1.2 FLT uses No data, while R4 uses No data.