Grand i10 1.2 FLT vs Veloster 2.0L MPI Mid Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
190 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
4 Seater
1420
/
3995
4220 mm
1680
1790 mm
1510
1399 mm
2450
2650 mm
/
320 L
Fuel Economy
18.1
13.9 Km/L
/
50 L
/
13.9 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.0 L - 1.2 L
1.6 L - 2.0 L
67 BHP - 84 BHP
127 BHP - 204 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
4 Seater
Engine
1.2 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
83 BHP
147 BHP
114
179 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Grand i10 1.2 FLT
Veloster 2.0L MPI Mid
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- Practical and comfortable interior design
- Economical in fuel consumption
- The cost is moderate compared to the class
Negative
- Engine performance is limited
- The storage space is small
- The interior material is not of high quality
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickVeloster 2.0L MPI Mid
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Grand i10 1.2 FLT if you care more about fuel economy; choose Veloster 2.0L MPI Mid if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Grand i10 1.2 FLT has a fuel consumption of 5.52, while Veloster 2.0L MPI Mid has a fuel consumption of 7.19. Therefore, Grand i10 1.2 FLT is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Grand i10 1.2 FLT has a wheelbase of 2450, while Veloster 2.0L MPI Mid has a wheelbase of 2650 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Veloster 2.0L MPI Mid, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Grand i10 1.2 FLT uses No data, while Veloster 2.0L MPI Mid uses Front Wheel Drive.