Grand Wagoneer Series III 3.0T vs Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

220 km/h

190 km/h

6

6

3000 cc

/

GCC

/

Dimensions

7 Seater

7

5 Doors

5 Doors

5758 mm

4828 mm

2123 mm

1943 mm

1920 mm

1792 mm

3302 mm

2916 mm

1251 L

782 L

254 m

/

Fuel Economy

6 Km/L

/

115 L

23 Gallon/ 87L

6 Km/L

10 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

/

Smart Keyless Entry

Interior

/

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

4-Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

Standard

2nd Row Manual 60:40 Split

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Collision Mitigation Braking System (CMBS)

/

Blind Spot Information System

Infotainment

12

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

19

/

Transmission

/

8AT

Chassis & Steering

Four Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

3.0 L

3.6 L - 6.4 L

510 BHP

286 BHP - 707 BHP

TBD

8AT & Automatic

Gasoline

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

7 Seater

5 - 7

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Black

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

/

3.0 L

3.6 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

Twin Turbo

/

4

/

510 BHP

293 BHP

678 Nm

350 Nm

/

3.6L V6

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Grand Wagoneer Series III 3.0T

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo

    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Versatility of options for powerful engines
  • Impressive off-road driving capabilities
  • High-end interior, equipped with modern technologies

Negative

  • High fuel consumption for some models
  • High price compared to some competitors
  • Large size, difficult to maneuver in confined spaces

Related comparisons

Editor's PickGrand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Grand Wagoneer Series III 3.0T if you care more about interior space; choose Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Jeep | Grand Wagoneer Series III 3.0T

VS

Toyota | Toyota Land Cruiser 2018 5.7L VXR

Jeep | Grand Wagoneer Series III 3.0T

VS

Tesla | Tesla Model X 2021 75D

Jeep | Grand Wagoneer Series III 3.0T

VS

Tesla | Tesla Model X 2020 75D

Jeep | Grand Wagoneer Series III 3.0T

VS

Tesla | Tesla Model X 2018 75D

Jeep | Grand Wagoneer Series III 3.0T

VS

Lincoln | Lincoln Navigator 2022 3.5T Reserve (AWD)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Grand Wagoneer Series III 3.0T has a fuel consumption of 16.67, while Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Grand Wagoneer Series III 3.0T has a wheelbase of 3302 mm, while Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo has a wheelbase of 2916 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Grand Wagoneer Series III 3.0T, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Grand Wagoneer Series III 3.0T uses Four Wheel Drive, while Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo uses All Wheel Drive.