Grand Wagoneer Series III 3.0T vs Range Rover SE P360 3.0L Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
220 km/h
/
6
/
3000 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
/
5758 mm
/
2123 mm
/
1920 mm
/
3302 mm
/
1251 L
/
254 m
/
Fuel Economy
6 Km/L
8.5
115 L
/
6 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
4-Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
12
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
19
/
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
/
Key Spec
3.0 L
3.0 L - 5.0 L
510 BHP
360 BHP - 525 BHP
TBD
Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
7 Seater
4 Seater - 5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
/
3.0 L
3.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Twin Turbo
/
4
/
510 BHP
360 BHP
678 Nm
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Grand Wagoneer Series III 3.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Range Rover SE P360 3.0L
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGrand Wagoneer Series III 3.0T
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Grand Wagoneer Series III 3.0T if you care more about price; choose Range Rover SE P360 3.0L if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Grand Wagoneer Series III 3.0T has a fuel consumption of 16.67, while Range Rover SE P360 3.0L has a fuel consumption of 11.76. Therefore, Range Rover SE P360 3.0L is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Grand Wagoneer Series III 3.0T has a wheelbase of 3302 mm, while Range Rover SE P360 3.0L has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Grand Wagoneer Series III 3.0T uses Four Wheel Drive, while Range Rover SE P360 3.0L uses No data.