Grandland X 1.6T Innovation + vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
201 km/h
161 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4477 mm
4341 mm
1856 mm
1804 mm
1609 mm
1693 mm
2675 mm
2676 mm
514 L
414 L
Fuel Economy
14.3 Km/L
17.2 Km/L
53 L
50 L
14.3 Km/L
17.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.6 L
1.6 L - 2.0 L
163 BHP
105 BHP - 135 BHP
Automatic
Automatic & CVT & Manual
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 - 5
Engine
1.6 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
163 BHP
115 BHP
240 Nm
156 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
Grandland X 1.6T Innovation +
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Duster 1.6L PE (4x2)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGrandland X 1.6T Innovation +
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Grandland X 1.6T Innovation + if you care more about price; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Grandland X 1.6T Innovation + has a fuel consumption of 6.99, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Grandland X 1.6T Innovation + has a wheelbase of 2675 mm, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Duster 1.6L PE (4x2), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Grandland X 1.6T Innovation + uses Front Wheel Drive, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) uses Front Wheel Drive.