CarteaCompare CarsGroove 1.5L LT vs Atto 3 Premium

Groove 1.5L LT vs Atto 3 Premium Comparison

Car Information

/

7.3S

/

420

/

60.48 kW/h

/

14.9

Engine / Motor

170 km/h

160 km/h

/

Chinese

Dimensions

5 Seater

5

16

215/55R18

4500 mm

4455 mm

/

5 Doors

/

2050 mm

/

1615 mm

/

2720 mm

/

440 L

/

205 mm

Fuel Economy

16.1 Km/L

/

45

/

16.1 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

Interior

/

Front Row Seats

/

5

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

LCD

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Single

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

Standard

Safety

2

/

/

/

/

Automatic Anti-Glare

/

RCW

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

4

8

/

12.8”Electric Rotary Multimedia Screen

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

/

Battery/Charging

/

AC (7KW) DC (80KW)

Transmission

CVT

DHT

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Key Spec

1.5 L - 1.5 L

/

110 BHP - 110 BHP

201 BHP

CVT & CVT

AT & DHT

Gasoline & Petrol

Electric

TBD

/

5 Seater

5 - 5

/

TBD

/

420 km

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

Engine

1.5 T

/

Gasoline

Electric

145hp

201 BHP

255Nm

310 Nm

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Motor

/

9

/

BYD Blade Battery (LFP)

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Groove 1.5L LT

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • ABS
  • Atto 3 Premium

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Lane Following Assist
    • Electric anti-dazzling room mirror
    • Collision Detection
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Modern and attractive exterior design
  • Economical fuel efficiency
  • Good and convenient internal space distribution

Negative

  • The engine performance is mediocre, especially when accelerating
  • The quality of interior details needs improvement
  • Insufficient sound insulation on highways

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickGroove 1.5L LT

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Groove 1.5L LT if you care more about price; choose Atto 3 Premium if you care more about power.

Popular Car Comparisons

Chevrolet | Groove 1.5L LT

VS

Haval | Haval H2 2018 1.5L Dignity

Chevrolet | Groove 1.5L LT

VS

Nissan | Nissan Kicks 2021 1.6 S

Chevrolet | Groove 1.5L LT

VS

Renault | Renault Duster 2020 2.0L PE (4x4)

Chevrolet | Groove 1.5L LT

VS

Renault | Renault Duster 2019 2.0L PE (4x4)

Chevrolet | Groove 1.5L LT

VS

Mitsubishi | Mitsubishi ASX 2018 2.0L GLX (2WD)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Groove 1.5L LT has a fuel consumption of 6.21, while Atto 3 Premium has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Groove 1.5L LT has a wheelbase of No data, while Atto 3 Premium has a wheelbase of 2720 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Groove 1.5L LT uses Front Wheel Drive, while Atto 3 Premium uses Front Wheel Drive.