CarteaCompare CarsGroove 1.5L LT vs Tiggo 7 CSH

Groove 1.5L LT vs Tiggo 7 CSH Comparison

Car Information

/

8.4 s

/

4553*1862*1696

/

90

Engine / Motor

170 km/h

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5

16

19

4500 mm

4553

/

1862

/

1696

/

2670

Fuel Economy

16.1 Km/L

41.7

45

/

16.1 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

Front Row Seats

/

10.25

/

/

Driver Seat

/

Driver Seat

/

10.25"

/

/

/

Triple

/

/

/

Safety

2

/

/

/

/

7

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

4

8

/

15.6

/

/

/

/

Battery/Charging

/

4

Transmission

CVT

DHT

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Drive

Key Spec

1.5 L - 1.5 L

1.5L

110 BHP - 110 BHP

204

CVT & CVT

DHT

Gasoline & Petrol

Hybrid

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5

Exterior

/

/

/

كهربائي

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.5 T

1.5L

Gasoline

Hybrid

145hp

204

255Nm

365

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Eco + Normal + Sport

/

/

/

Motor

/

6.6

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Groove 1.5L LT

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • ABS
  • Tiggo 7 CSH

    • Power Tailgate
    • Rear Defogger
    • Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK)
    • Number of Airbags
    • Lane Following Assist
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Modern and attractive exterior design
  • Economical fuel efficiency
  • Good and convenient internal space distribution

Negative

  • The engine performance is mediocre, especially when accelerating
  • The quality of interior details needs improvement
  • Insufficient sound insulation on highways

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickGroove 1.5L LT

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Groove 1.5L LT if you care more about price; choose Tiggo 7 CSH if you care more about fuel economy.

Popular Car Comparisons

Chevrolet | Groove 1.5L LT

VS

Haval | Haval H2 2018 1.5L Dignity

Chevrolet | Groove 1.5L LT

VS

Nissan | Nissan Kicks 2021 1.6 S

Chevrolet | Groove 1.5L LT

VS

Renault | Renault Duster 2020 2.0L PE (4x4)

Chevrolet | Groove 1.5L LT

VS

Renault | Renault Duster 2019 2.0L PE (4x4)

Chevrolet | Groove 1.5L LT

VS

Mitsubishi | Mitsubishi ASX 2018 2.0L GLX (2WD)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Groove 1.5L LT has a fuel consumption of 6.21, while Tiggo 7 CSH has a fuel consumption of 2.4. Therefore, Tiggo 7 CSH is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Groove 1.5L LT has a wheelbase of No data, while Tiggo 7 CSH has a wheelbase of 2670. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Groove 1.5L LT uses Front Wheel Drive, while Tiggo 7 CSH uses Front Drive.