GS 8 2.0T GL (2WD) vs Kia Telluride 2024 3.8L V6 EX (AWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
/
/
6
Dimensions
7 Seater
8 Seater
4980 mm
5001
1950 mm
2009
1780 mm
1801
2920 mm
3081
Fuel Economy
13.3 Km/L
12.8
66 L
/
13.3 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
3.8 L - 3.8 L
248 BHP - 332 BHP
291 - 291
8-Speed Automatic & 8AT & Automatic
8 Speed AT & Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7 - 7
7 - 8
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
3.8 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
248 BHP
291 BHP
400 Nm
355
Technologies
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
GS 8 2.0T GL (2WD)
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Kia Telluride 2024 3.8L V6 EX (AWD)
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGS 8 2.0T GL (2WD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GS 8 2.0T GL (2WD) if you care more about price; choose Kia Telluride 2024 3.8L V6 EX (AWD) if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GS 8 2.0T GL (2WD) has a fuel consumption of 7.52, while Kia Telluride 2024 3.8L V6 EX (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 7.81. Therefore, GS 8 2.0T GL (2WD) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GS 8 2.0T GL (2WD) has a wheelbase of 2920 mm, while Kia Telluride 2024 3.8L V6 EX (AWD) has a wheelbase of 3081. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Kia Telluride 2024 3.8L V6 EX (AWD) , offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GS 8 2.0T GL (2WD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while Kia Telluride 2024 3.8L V6 EX (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.