CarteaCompare CarsGS4 1.5T GB vs GS3 1.3T GB

GS4 1.5T GB vs GS3 1.3T GB Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

180 km/h

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

4545 mm

4350 mm

1856 mm

1825 mm

1668 mm

1680 mm

2680 mm

2560 mm

470 L

370 L

Fuel Economy

14.7 Km/L

13.3 Km/L

55 L

50 L

14.7 Km/L

13.3 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

Safety

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Key Spec

1.5 L - 1.5 L

1.3 L - 1.5 L

165 BHP - 248

172 BHP - 202 BHP

8AT

7DCT & Automatic & DCT

Gasoline

Petrol & Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 - 5

5 Seater - 5 Seater

Exterior

/

Engine

1.5 L

1.3 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

165 BHP

202 BHP

265 Nm

137 Nm

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • GS4 1.5T GB

    • 360 Degree camera
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS
  • GS3 1.3T GB

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickGS3 1.3T GB

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose GS4 1.5T GB if you care more about fuel economy; choose GS3 1.3T GB if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

GAC | GS4 1.5T GB

VS

Exeed | LX Luxury

GAC | GS4 1.5T GB

VS

Peugeot | 2008 1.2T GT (155HP)

GAC | GS4 1.5T GB

VS

Nissan | XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater)

GAC | GS4 1.5T GB

VS

Jeep | Renegade Limited

GAC | GS4 1.5T GB

VS

Jeep | Renegade Trailhawk

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, GS4 1.5T GB has a fuel consumption of 6.8, while GS3 1.3T GB has a fuel consumption of 7.52. Therefore, GS4 1.5T GB is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, GS4 1.5T GB has a wheelbase of 2680 mm, while GS3 1.3T GB has a wheelbase of 2560 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, GS4 1.5T GB, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GS4 1.5T GB uses Front Wheel Drive, while GS3 1.3T GB uses Front Wheel Drive.