GS4 1.5T GB vs GS4 1.5T GB Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

180 km/h

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

/

4545 mm

/

1856 mm

/

1668 mm

/

2680 mm

/

470 L

/

Fuel Economy

14.7 Km/L

/

55 L

/

14.7 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

/

Key Spec

1.5 L - 1.5 L

/

165 BHP - 248

/

8AT

/

Gasoline

/

TBD

/

5 - 5

/

Exterior

/

/

Engine

1.5 L

/

Gasoline

/

165 BHP

/

265 Nm

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • GS4 1.5T GB

    • 360 Degree camera
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS
  • GS4 1.5T GB

    • 360 Degree camera
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickGS4 1.5T GB

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose GS4 1.5T GB if you care more about overall equipment; choose GS4 1.5T GB if you care more about overall equipment.

Popular Car Comparisons

GAC | GS4 1.5T GB

VS

Exeed | LX Luxury

GAC | GS4 1.5T GB

VS

Peugeot | 2008 1.2T GT (155HP)

GAC | GS4 1.5T GB

VS

Nissan | XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater)

GAC | GS4 1.5T GB

VS

Jeep | Renegade Limited

GAC | GS4 1.5T GB

VS

Jeep | Renegade Trailhawk

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, GS4 1.5T GB has a fuel consumption of 6.8, while GS4 1.5T GB has a fuel consumption of 6.8. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, GS4 1.5T GB has a wheelbase of 2680 mm, while GS4 1.5T GB has a wheelbase of 2680 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GS4 1.5T GB uses Front Wheel Drive, while GS4 1.5T GB uses Front Wheel Drive.