GS5 1.5T GE vs Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190 km/h
190 km/h
/
4
/
3490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4695 mm
5004 mm
1885 mm
1978 mm
1700 mm
1802 mm
2710 mm
2900 mm
/
5 Doors
/
470 L
Fuel Economy
14.3 Km/L
9.4 Km/L
55 L
74 L
14.3 Km/L
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.5 L
2.5 L - 3.5 L
169 BHP
250 BHP - 271 BHP
TBD
9AT & Automatic & CVT
Gasoline
Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
7 - 8 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
3.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
169 BHP
271 BHP
265 Nm
340 Nm
/
In-Line
/
None
/
4
Comparison of configuration highlights
GS5 1.5T GE
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious interior space and flexible storage
- Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
- Comprehensive and advanced security equipment
Negative
- Medium fuel economy
- Traditional interior design needs updating
- Noticeable noise during high speeds
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGS5 1.5T GE
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GS5 1.5T GE if you care more about price; choose Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GS5 1.5T GE has a fuel consumption of 6.99, while Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD has a fuel consumption of 10.64. Therefore, GS5 1.5T GE is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GS5 1.5T GE has a wheelbase of 2710 mm, while Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD has a wheelbase of 2900 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GS5 1.5T GE uses Front Wheel Drive, while Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive.