GT 1.5L COM vs Arrizo 8 Pro comfort Comparison

Car Information

/

115

/

230

/

4780× 1843×1469

/

1.5

Engine / Motor

185 km/h

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5

4 Doors

/

4675 mm

4780

1842 mm

1843

1473 mm

1469

2680 mm

2790

401 L

/

/

17 inch

Fuel Economy

17.5 Km/L

/

45 L

51

17.5 Km/L

/

Comfort

✓

/

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

Interior

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

Safety

/

✓

/

4

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

Infotainment

/

10.25

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

6

Transmission

/

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

✓

/

Electronic Parking

/

205/55 R17

/

205/55 R17

Key Spec

1.5 L

-

118 BHP - 173 BHP

197 - 241

Automatic & CVT

Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5

Exterior

✓

/

/

يدوي

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

Engine

1.5 L

1.6

Gasoline

Gasoline

118 BHP

197

150 Nm

290

/

Turbocharge

/

137

/

5500

/

91 号汽油

Technologies

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • GT 1.5L COM

    • Rear Camera
  • Arrizo 8 Pro comfort

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electric Locks
    • Seats - Comfort
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Lane Following Assist
    • Driving Recorder
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Active Safety Warning System
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
    • Seat belt reminder

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickGT 1.5L COM

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose GT 1.5L COM if you care more about price; choose Arrizo 8 Pro comfort if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

MG | GT 1.5L COM

VS

Hyundai | Hyundai Elantra 2022 1.6L Comfort

MG | GT 1.5L COM

VS

Nissan | SUNNY SV Plus

MG | GT 1.5L COM

VS

Toyota | Corolla 1.6L XLI

MG | GT 1.5L COM

VS

Toyota | Yaris Sedan G

MG | GT 1.5L COM

VS

Toyota | Toyota Corolla 2024 1.6L XLI

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, GT 1.5L COM has a fuel consumption of 5.71, while Arrizo 8 Pro comfort has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, GT 1.5L COM has a wheelbase of 2680 mm, while Arrizo 8 Pro comfort has a wheelbase of 2790. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Arrizo 8 Pro comfort, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GT 1.5L COM uses Front Wheel Drive, while Arrizo 8 Pro comfort uses Front Drive.