GT 1.5L COM vs Mage E1 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
185 km/h
190
/
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4 Doors
/
4675 mm
4650
1842 mm
1905
1473 mm
1630
2680 mm
2775
401 L
/
/
1480
/
19
Fuel Economy
17.5 Km/L
15.8
45 L
51
17.5 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
4
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
13.2
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
/
AT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
235/55 R19
/
235/55 R19
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1.5 L
1.5
118 BHP - 173 BHP
202 BHP
7DCT & Automatic & CVT
AT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.5
Gasoline
Gasoline
118 BHP
202 BHP
150 Nm
305
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
GT 1.5L COM
- Rear Camera
Mage E1
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- 360 Degree Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMage E1
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GT 1.5L COM if you care more about fuel economy; choose Mage E1 if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GT 1.5L COM has a fuel consumption of 5.71, while Mage E1 has a fuel consumption of 6.33. Therefore, GT 1.5L COM is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GT 1.5L COM has a wheelbase of 2680 mm, while Mage E1 has a wheelbase of 2775. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mage E1, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GT 1.5L COM uses Front Wheel Drive, while Mage E1 uses Front Drive.