GT 1.5L COM vs Seal 6 Design Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
185 km/h
180
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4 Doors
4
4675 mm
4830
1842 mm
1875
1473 mm
1495
2680 mm
2790
401 L
491
/
1630
Fuel Economy
17.5 Km/L
16.95
45 L
/
17.5 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
Dual
Infotainment
/
12.8"
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Battery/Charging
/
3.3
Transmission
/
eCVT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
Key Spec
1.5 L
1.5
118 BHP - 173 BHP
174
Automatic & CVT
eCVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.5
Gasoline
Hybrid
118 BHP
174
150 Nm
/
Motor
/
Lithium iron phosphate battery
/
161
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
GT 1.5L COM
- Rear Camera
Seal 6 Design
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
Review Comparison
Positive
- Attractive sporty design
- Good fuel efficiency
- Advanced technical features
Negative
- Limited background space
- Less acceleration compared to some competitors
- Limited engine options
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGT 1.5L COM
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GT 1.5L COM if you care more about price; choose Seal 6 Design if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GT 1.5L COM has a fuel consumption of 5.71, while Seal 6 Design has a fuel consumption of 5.9. Therefore, GT 1.5L COM is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GT 1.5L COM has a wheelbase of 2680 mm, while Seal 6 Design has a wheelbase of 2790. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Seal 6 Design, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GT 1.5L COM uses Front Wheel Drive, while Seal 6 Design uses Front Drive.