GT 1.5T COM vs Ciciv SPORT Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
200
Dimensions
5
5
1539
/
18
/
4 Doors
/
4571
4689
1855
1801
1719
1415
2708
,735
430
/
145
/
Fuel Economy
16.9 Km/L
/
55
47
16.9 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
2
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
14.1
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
6
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
7DCT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
225/50 R18
/
225/50 R18
/
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1498 L
1.5 L - 1600 L
118 BHP - 173 BHP
123 BHP - 180 BHP
7DCT & Automatic & CVT
Automatic & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5
2.0
Gasoline
Gasoline
171
150
275
181
/
112
/
6400
/
5000
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
GT 1.5T COM
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- Intelligent Emergency Call
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
Ciciv SPORT
- Push Button Start
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Child Safety Monitoring System
- Collision Safety Door Latch Open System
- Collision Safety Cut-Out
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Driving Recorder
- Security System
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- High fuel efficiency
- Long lasting reliability
- High quality interior design
Negative
- Limited rear space for passengers
- Average off road performance
- An insufficiently innovative infotainment system
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGT 1.5T COM
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GT 1.5T COM if you care more about price; choose Ciciv SPORT if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GT 1.5T COM has a fuel consumption of 5.92, while Ciciv SPORT has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GT 1.5T COM has a wheelbase of 2708, while Ciciv SPORT has a wheelbase of ,735. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, GT 1.5T COM, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GT 1.5T COM uses Front Drive, while Ciciv SPORT uses No data.