GT 4.0T V8 Coupe vs AMG GT 63 4MATIC Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
326 km/h
315 km/h
/
8
/
3982 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
2 Seater
2 Seater
4683 mm
4728 mm
2045 mm
1984 mm
1213 mm
1354 mm
2675 mm
2700 mm
150 L
350 L
/
2 Doors
Fuel Economy
9.3 Km/L
4 Km/L
72 L
80 L
9.3 Km/L
4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
0.0 L - 4.0 L
4.0 L - 4.0 L
620 BHP
429 HP - 831 hp
Automatic
9-speed automatic & AMG SPEEDSHIFT® MCT 9-speed & Automatic & SPEEDSHIFT® TCT 9-speed
Gasoline
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
TBD
TBD
2 Seater
2 Seater - 4
Engine
4.0 L
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
620 BHP
577 BHP
630 Nm
800 Nm
/
V
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Exterior
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
GT 4.0T V8 Coupe
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Camera
AMG GT 63 4MATIC
- Remote key types
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGT 4.0T V8 Coupe
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GT 4.0T V8 Coupe if you care more about price; choose AMG GT 63 4MATIC if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GT 4.0T V8 Coupe has a fuel consumption of 10.75, while AMG GT 63 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of 25. Therefore, GT 4.0T V8 Coupe is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GT 4.0T V8 Coupe has a wheelbase of 2675 mm, while AMG GT 63 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 2700 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, AMG GT 63 4MATIC, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GT 4.0T V8 Coupe uses Rear Wheel Drive, while AMG GT 63 4MATIC uses All Wheel Drive.