CarteaCompare CarsGV80 3.5T Royal (AWD) vs Bronco Badlands 2.7L

GV80 3.5T Royal (AWD) vs Bronco Badlands 2.7L Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

240 km/h

180 km/h

/

6

/

2698 cc

/

GCC

Dimensions

7 Seater

5 Seater

5 Doors

4 Doors

4945 mm

4800 mm

1975 mm

1937 mm

1715 mm

1962 mm

2955 mm

2950 mm

737 L

562 L

/

260 m

Fuel Economy

9.2 Km/L

9.2 Km/L

9.2 Km/L

9.2 Km/L

/

79 L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

12

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

7

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Four Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.5 L - 3.5 L

2.3 L - 3.0 L

300 BHP - 375 BHP

181 - 418 BHP

Automatic

8-speed Automatic & Automatic

Gasoline

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

7 Seater

4 - 5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Engine

3.5 L

2.7 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

375 BHP

330 BHP

530 Nm

542 Nm

/

V

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • GV80 3.5T Royal (AWD)

    • Rear Camera
    • ABS
  • Bronco Badlands 2.7L

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Attractive and iconic design
  • Excellent off-road capabilities
  • Multiple engine options

Negative

  • High price for top categories
  • Limited internal storage space
  • Significant fuel consumption

Related comparisons

Editor's PickBronco Badlands 2.7L

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose GV80 3.5T Royal (AWD) if you care more about interior space; choose Bronco Badlands 2.7L if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Genesis | GV80 3.5T Royal (AWD)

VS

Polestar | Polestar 3 2024 Long Range (Dual Motor)

Genesis | GV80 3.5T Royal (AWD)

VS

Nio | EL8 Standard Range

Genesis | GV80 3.5T Royal (AWD)

VS

Hongqi | EHS9 Executive

Genesis | GV80 3.5T Royal (AWD)

VS

Hongqi | EHS9 Executive

Genesis | GV80 3.5T Royal (AWD)

VS

Jaguar | Jaguar I Pace 2022 EV400 SE (AWD)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, GV80 3.5T Royal (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 10.87, while Bronco Badlands 2.7L has a fuel consumption of 10.87. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, GV80 3.5T Royal (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2955 mm, while Bronco Badlands 2.7L has a wheelbase of 2950 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, GV80 3.5T Royal (AWD), offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GV80 3.5T Royal (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive, while Bronco Badlands 2.7L uses Four Wheel Drive.