GX3 PRO GK vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
161 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4005
4341 mm
1575
1804 mm
1760
1693 mm
2480
2676 mm
250
414 L
Fuel Economy
/
17.2 Km/L
/
50 L
/
17.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
Front
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
2
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front Row
/
Infotainment
3.5
/
2
/
Transmission
CVT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
205/60 R16
/
205/60 R16
/
Key Spec
1.5
1.6 L - 2.0 L
100 BHP - 102
105 BHP - 135 BHP
CVT
Automatic & CVT & Manual
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
1.5
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
100 BHP
115 BHP
/
156 Nm
Technologies
Rear
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
GX3 PRO GK
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Push Button Start
- Collision Safety Door Latch Open System
- Collision Safety Cut-Out
- Number of Airbags
- Crash Auto Door Unlock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Seat belt reminder
Duster 1.6L PE (4x2)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDuster 1.6L PE (4x2)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GX3 PRO GK if you care more about overall equipment; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GX3 PRO GK has a fuel consumption of No data, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GX3 PRO GK has a wheelbase of 2480, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Duster 1.6L PE (4x2), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GX3 PRO GK uses Front Drive, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) uses Front Wheel Drive.