GX3 PRO GK vs DFSK Fengon 500 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
180
Dimensions
5
5
16"
17"
4005
/
1760
/
1575
/
2480
/
Fuel Economy
15
13.9
/
50
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
/
/
Interior
3.5"
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Leather
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
2
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
2
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
AT
Chassis & Steering
Electric
/
/
Front Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
1.5
1.5T
100 BHP - 102
156
CVT
AT
Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5
5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5
1.5T
Gasoline
Gasoline
102
156
140
220
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
GX3 PRO GK
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Collision Detection
- Crash Auto Door Unlock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
DFSK Fengon 500
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Lane Following Assist
- ABS
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDFSK Fengon 500
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GX3 PRO GK if you care more about fuel economy; choose DFSK Fengon 500 if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GX3 PRO GK has a fuel consumption of 6.67, while DFSK Fengon 500 has a fuel consumption of 7.19. Therefore, GX3 PRO GK is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GX3 PRO GK has a wheelbase of 2480, while DFSK Fengon 500 has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GX3 PRO GK uses No data, while DFSK Fengon 500 uses Front Drive.