GX3 PRO GK vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
161 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
16"
/
4005
4341 mm
1760
1804 mm
1575
1693 mm
2480
2676 mm
/
414 L
Fuel Economy
15
17.2 Km/L
/
50 L
/
17.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
Interior
3.5"
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Leather
/
Safety
✓
/
2
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
2
/
Transmission
CVT
/
Chassis & Steering
Electric
/
/
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.5
1.6 L - 2.0 L
100 BHP - 102
105 BHP - 135 BHP
CVT
Automatic & CVT & Manual
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
1.5
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
102
115 BHP
140
156 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
GX3 PRO GK
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Collision Detection
- Crash Auto Door Unlock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
Duster 1.6L PE (4x2)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDuster 1.6L PE (4x2)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GX3 PRO GK if you care more about overall equipment; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GX3 PRO GK has a fuel consumption of 6.67, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GX3 PRO GK has a wheelbase of 2480, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Duster 1.6L PE (4x2), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GX3 PRO GK uses No data, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) uses Front Wheel Drive.